<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two Down: Exam 70-536 &#8211; .NET 2.0 App Development Foundation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2006/07/two-down-exam-70-536-net-20-app-development-foundation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2006/07/two-down-exam-70-536-net-20-app-development-foundation/</link>
	<description>Visual Studio, .NET, BizTalk Server, SQL Server and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shekhar</title>
		<link>http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2006/07/two-down-exam-70-536-net-20-app-development-foundation/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Shekhar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/?p=60#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I appeared in 70-536 and got only 650 in it but I prepared for 7 days only. As posted by Thomas, the questions code samples and small set on direct class. The questions were tweaked with usage of multiple classes together. I read small bit of MSDN and this is the mistake. 

The MS book for 70-536 is helpful but it misses the usage of advanced classes and some places is ambigous. I like to understand things diagramatically using class diagrams (snippets) etc which I do not see in MSDN as well as in the book.

I will post my experiences with the round 2 of preparations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appeared in 70-536 and got only 650 in it but I prepared for 7 days only. As posted by Thomas, the questions code samples and small set on direct class. The questions were tweaked with usage of multiple classes together. I read small bit of MSDN and this is the mistake. </p>
<p>The MS book for 70-536 is helpful but it misses the usage of advanced classes and some places is ambigous. I like to understand things diagramatically using class diagrams (snippets) etc which I do not see in MSDN as well as in the book.</p>
<p>I will post my experiences with the round 2 of preparations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
