<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solution to Error in BizTalk 2006 R2 WCF Service Consuming Wizard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2008/01/solution-to-error-in-biztalk-2006-r2-wcf-service-consuming-wizard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2008/01/solution-to-error-in-biztalk-2006-r2-wcf-service-consuming-wizard/</link>
	<description>Visual Studio, .NET, BizTalk Server, SQL Server and more...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:01:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2008/01/solution-to-error-in-biztalk-2006-r2-wcf-service-consuming-wizard/comment-page-1/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/?p=109#comment-138</guid>
		<description>Hi Josh,

I&#039;m not exactly sure what you are referring to when you say &quot;the service&quot;, so I&#039;ll assume you mean a WCF service out of BizTalk.  There is no need for any WSE 3.0 components.  WCF already provides support for MTOM and the WS-Security protocol (see wsHttpBinding).  If you need exact compatibility with an existing WSE 3.0 client, you can create a custom WCF binding for that.  If you are not talking about a BizTalk service, I would strongly push you to use WCF for the same reasons, except that you&#039;d obviously be writing the service with regular .NET code.  WSCF can be used to create WSDL which can in turn be converted to a WCF service interface with svcutil.exe from .NET 3.0/3.5.

I hope that helps.  Thanks, Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Josh,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure what you are referring to when you say &#8220;the service&#8221;, so I&#8217;ll assume you mean a WCF service out of BizTalk.  There is no need for any WSE 3.0 components.  WCF already provides support for MTOM and the WS-Security protocol (see wsHttpBinding).  If you need exact compatibility with an existing WSE 3.0 client, you can create a custom WCF binding for that.  If you are not talking about a BizTalk service, I would strongly push you to use WCF for the same reasons, except that you&#8217;d obviously be writing the service with regular .NET code.  WSCF can be used to create WSDL which can in turn be converted to a WCF service interface with svcutil.exe from .NET 3.0/3.5.</p>
<p>I hope that helps.  Thanks, Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Korn</title>
		<link>http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/2008/01/solution-to-error-in-biztalk-2006-r2-wcf-service-consuming-wizard/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Korn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tfabraham.com/blog/?p=109#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Tom:

I noticed that you have some passing familiarity with WSCF. I&#039;m using it on a customer project, and wondering if there&#039;s some way you know of to add the WSE 3.0 pipeline to the service&#039;s stack -- so I can get turnkey security and MTOM.

Any idea if this is possible?

Thanks

Josh

josh.korn (at) diligentsia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom:</p>
<p>I noticed that you have some passing familiarity with WSCF. I&#8217;m using it on a customer project, and wondering if there&#8217;s some way you know of to add the WSE 3.0 pipeline to the service&#8217;s stack &#8212; so I can get turnkey security and MTOM.</p>
<p>Any idea if this is possible?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Josh</p>
<p>josh.korn (at) diligentsia.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
